Grow Therapy Interview Questions
& Process

The interview process was typical, starting with a recruiter screen and moving to a technical round that included presentations and exercises. However, just a few days before the scheduled final round (which included cross-functional interviews, problem-solving exercises, a "Bar Raiser" interview, and a portfolio presentation), I got an automated email saying "thanks for your interest, role filled." I really thought it was a mistake. Since it was sent late on a Friday, I had to wait until Monday to get any clarification. It was super frustrating because I had spent my whole weekend preparing for the interviews. Unfortunately, the recruiting team used an automated system to cancel the final round instead of sending a personal email. It felt really dismissive, especially considering how much time I invested in preparing for these interviews. This could be easily fixed by sending a templated email from the recruiter's inbox, not from the ATS.

My interview process with Grow took just under three weeks and was honestly a great experience. It was really streamlined but still thoughtful and thorough. There were four rounds total: a phone screen, hiring manager interview, mock call, and a final conversation with the Director of Sales. I really appreciated how intentional each step felt. Every conversation left time for questions and everyone I spoke with was transparent, and took the time to really answer everything I asked. I never felt rushed or in the dark about what was coming next. Huge shoutout to Brynn, my recruiter!!! She was amazing throughout the ENTIRE process. She was always available if I needed advice or prep and she explained everything so clearly that I felt confident walking into all of my interviews!! Honestly...Because of how well ran + transparent the process was, accepting the offer was a no brainer!! Overall a really positive experience that made me even more excited to join the team :)

The interview process was pretty smooth until the take-home assignment. They initially asked me to write a smoke test for a section of the website, which sounded pretty simple. However, after I submitted it, the feedback was that they wanted more detail. I tried to get clarification, but they didn't respond. My friend who also applied went through the assignment stage, and she mentioned that during a conversation about it, the requirements seemed unclear, like they weren't sure what they were looking for. Based on that chat and my experience, she ended up doing a combined smoke and regression test, and they really liked it, moving her to the next stage. So, my advice is to be really careful with the assignment and try to get as much clarity as possible upfront.

It was a really long and drawn-out process, felt kind of negative overall. They rescheduled a few times and there were 2-3 weeks between interviews. I had 7 interviews in total, each about 30-45 minutes, spread over about 2 months. All the interviews involved case studies or exercises, which was good. I was told the last interview was finished and that the HM was checking references, but then there was a surprise presentation interview. I think they were unsure and wanted to see more skills. I didn't get an offer, so maybe my presentation wasn't what they needed. The process included a recruiter screener, a hiring manager call, a technical PM interview focused on healthcare data, a data modeling/fluency interview about metrics, a behavioral interview about working with others, a product sense case study for new LinkedIn features, and a panel presentation about a past product. Overall, it took a lot of time and felt like the team was indecisive. Also, a recruiter messaged me on LinkedIn as if he didn't know me, asking me to apply for a job. My interaction with the recruiter felt impersonal, like they were too busy or not engaged.