Goodgame Studios Interview Questions
& Process

The interview involved questions about my past experience, followed by a sort of test where I had to answer potential questions from customers. There was also some casual chat. It was a pleasant and pretty easy process in a friendly setting, so I felt really relaxed.

The interview process started with an HR call where we discussed salary expectations. HR mentioned their budget was exactly my current salary, which wasn't a great start. There were several weeks of delays between each subsequent interview stage. Following this, there was a design test that required an estimated 16-24 hours of unpaid work. After completing three interviews, I was ultimately offered a role that was a level lower than the one I applied for, with a significantly reduced salary package compared to my current earnings. I declined the offer, feeling it was a waste of time.

This was a bogus interview, designed to get work done by candidates during the COVID-19 situation. It started with an HR screening, followed by two rounds with the product head and another product person. They kept saying they were happy with me and my solutions for their business problems. Then came the assignment where I had to play their game, identify 5 problem areas, and suggest 5 features for their live game, needing a polished solution. I was skeptical, having read similar reviews about companies using candidates for free work. Still, I decided to give it my best shot. The worst part was being ghosted for two full months, despite sending follow-up emails. I realized my time was wasted and moved on. Eventually, they emailed back saying they liked my solutions but weren't moving forward because they aren't hiring for that specific role. Coming from a strong gaming background, I've seen companies use interviews for ideas and free work. So, if you don't want this trauma and waste of time, stay away.

The whole interview process took forever, like three months. I actually quit midway because I got a better offer elsewhere. It started with an automated video interview, which was the worst. You have no room for error; the machine gives you a tiny window to record your answer, and it's super stressful. For example, 'Your 5 favorite patterns?' and you only get 3 minutes. If you pause to think or find the right words, half the time is gone. Then, if you realize you need to add something crucial, you only have 30 seconds left and might get cut off mid-sentence. It was incredibly frustrating. After that, every single step took at least a couple of weeks. Waiting two weeks for a response, then six weeks for them to review a test task, then scheduling another interview three weeks out, another two-three weeks for feedback, and then scheduling *another* interview a few weeks away... It was just ridiculous. On top of that, the last two interviews were non-technical, just the usual 'who are you, tell us about yourself' type questions. While those aren't inherently bad, having them back-to-back with a month in between? Really? I've seen lots of bad reviews from current employees about their processes and management, and now I totally get it.