WSA Interview Questions
& Process

The interview process was smooth, well-organized, and efficient from start to finish. The interviewer was kind, approachable, and easygoing, which made the conversation feel natural and comfortable. The questions were clear, straightforward, and not overly difficult, allowing me to share my experiences confidently.

It's a drive kind of F2F interview. Where you will see 20-30 candidates in each tech. Good thing is they will complete process for 1-2 hrs for all candidates and send out. I believe, They are doing for Audit or Beneficiary purpose. Good thing is you just need to tell I have an interview. All outside staff will respond WSA right from security guards, receptionists, lift man.

There were two technical interview rounds. First, an HR call, then a one-hour discussion with two panel members. One panel member focused on manual testing, and the other on automation and coding. The job description was for an Automation Test Engineer, but they mentioned I'd also do manual testing and asked manual testing questions, even though I don't have prior experience in it. My advice to the company would be to be clear in the job description if they are looking for manual testers to avoid wasting people's time.

I've applied to this company a few times now because I really care about the product, hearing aids, since someone close to me uses them and it makes a big difference in their life. I've also applied for other engineering roles that seemed like a good fit for my skills. For the first interview with the first level managers, they asked why I'd applied so many times. I said it was because of the impact the product has on someone I know. One manager then suggested other jobs like pacemakers or working at A*star were more impactful. I responded that while their product might not save lives, it definitely improves them over time. She didn't seem convinced and suggested I could consider developing technology or starting a business instead. I was a bit taken aback that they questioned what I find meaningful. In the next interview with the director, he asked why I also applied for an R&D engineering role. I explained that my studies and previous work experience made me a good candidate for both. As we were leaving in the lift, he said 'roll dice to you,' and when I asked what he meant, he clarified it as 'all the best to you.' This made me question if it's unusual to apply for more than one role. Honestly, the whole experience left me feeling disillusioned about how this company treats applicants. It feels like they disapprove of people reapplying for work they find meaningful. As an interviewee, I didn't feel respected, and it raises concerns about the company culture and leadership values, which isn't great for their employer brand.