WorkSpan logo

WorkSpan Frontend Engineer Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 5 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

3.4 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
100% Positive experience

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at WorkSpan.

Showing 3 of 5
WorkSpan logo
WorkSpan

Front End Engineer

Engineering · more than a year ago

Entry Average Positive experience Accept offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Take home Onsite
Interview formats
Coding Technical Other

The whole interview took about 2 weeks and had 4 steps total, which went pretty well. First up was a phone screen, lasting about 30 minutes. Right after that, we set up a technical interview with a senior engineer. This lasted about an hour and was split into two parts: a coding challenge and then a technical Q&A covering algorithms, data structures, and specific web tech like JavaScript and Angular. The interviewer was helpful, even giving me hints. After passing, I got the test project details, due in a week. It involved building a basic Angular web app to display data with a few extra features. The project took me about 10-15 hours. The final step was a 30-minute review of the project, similar to a code review.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you explain space and time complexity, DI, and other Design Patterns?
WorkSpan logo
WorkSpan

Front End Engineer

Engineering · more than a year ago

Mid Average Positive experience Accept offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Take home Technical screen Onsite Offer
Interview formats
Technical Coding

I applied to several companies at a career fair, and WorkSpan was the first to get back to me. The initial phone screen questions were pretty standard for front end roles, and honestly a bit easier than some of the bigger companies I applied to. After that, I had to complete a take-home assignment, which I really put a lot of effort into, even though they said it should only take a few hours. The onsite interview had 3 separate sessions, which was less intense than the all-day interviews at other places, but it was still challenging. The team I was interviewing with seemed to be moving quickly and gave off the impression they knew exactly what they wanted and were serious about the process. I appreciated their direct approach and ended up accepting their offer.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Mostly JavaScript Olympics style questions with basic algorithms.
WorkSpan logo
WorkSpan

Front End Developer

Engineering

Entry Easy Positive experience Accept offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Presentation

The interview was super interactive, more of a conversation than a one-way street. They were really enthusiastic and positive at WorkSpan. A lot of the chat was about my career journey. We also got into discussing WorkSpan's future plans.

Confirmed questions3 questions
  • Can you describe the projects you've been involved with?
  • What experience do you have up to this point?
  • What are your goals for the future?

WorkSpan Frontend Engineer Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from WorkSpan interview reports.

How would you go about implementing SVG imagery within the current WorkSpan stack?

Read reports

Can you explain space and time complexity, DI, and other Design Patterns?

Read reports

Are you interested in contributing to the implementation of SVG imagery in the WorkSpan stack?

Read reports

What kind of styleguide did you adhere to in your previous work and projects?

Read report

Can you share an example of your work that you're particularly proud of?

Read report

What would you say is your core specialty and strongest competence within the tech stacks your previous teams worked with?

Read report

Can you describe the projects you've been involved with?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 5 WorkSpan interview reports.

Interview formats

Technical 38.5%
Behavioral 23.1%
Coding 23.1%
Presentation 7.7%
Other 7.7%

Interview difficulty

Easy 20%
Average 80%
Difficult 0%

Candidate experience

Positive 100%