WorkJam logo

WorkJam Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 14 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

2.3 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
64.3% Positive experience

Which role are you interviewing for?

7 roles · 14 reports

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at WorkJam.

Showing 4 of 14
WorkJam logo
WorkJam

Software Engineer

Engineering · a year ago

Mid Easy Positive experience Accept offer 2 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite Offer
Interview formats
Technical Coding Behavioral

TA reached out to me on LinkedIn. Had a 30min screen the next day, then scheduled me for a 1.5 hr interview the week after. First part was typical but casual/conversational. 2nd part was the coding portion. The technical part was a java coding exercise with pair programming, focusing on REST API and design patterns knowledge. Few deeper technical questions came up, and they let me google some parts to find solutions. Not 2 days later I got the offer. All interviewers were super friendly and helpful. The whole process from initial message to offer was less than 2 weeks; super efficient. Honestly, one of the best interview experiences I've had.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you explain dependency injection in Spring?
WorkJam logo
WorkJam

Backend Developer

Engineering · more than a year ago

Mid Average Positive experience Accept offer 1 round
Interview process
Recruiter call
Interview formats
Behavioral

I had a really great time interviewing at WorkJam! The recruiter was awesome the whole way through, keeping me in the loop and making sure I felt good about everything. Everyone I talked to was super friendly and knew their stuff, and they really made me feel like they cared about finding the right person. It was obvious they want the best fit for their team. I'm really hoping I get to join such a cool company.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • What helps you feel comfortable in your day-to-day work?
WorkJam logo
WorkJam

Product Owner

Product · more than a year ago

Mid Average Negative experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Technical screen Onsite Background check Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Case Presentation

So, there were three stages to this interview process. The first one with the local team? It was genuinely one of the best interviews I've ever had, like, I really enjoyed it and could tell they did too. There was this amazing cultural fit, and I got the sense this team was all set for massive growth and needed some special people to get there. Then came the second round with international senior leadership, folks in the US and Montreal. This was a technical interview, really testing how I'd handle the role. Some super tricky questions, honestly. It didn't go as perfectly as I'd hoped. The questions were pretty open-ended, which is normal for Product Owner roles, but my usual methods didn't quite land with them. Not sure if it was a cultural difference (Australia vs. US), a misunderstanding of scale because I was talking about Australian companies, or what. They told me I didn't get it, giving feedback that the role had 'expanded' to be global and I was out for not having served external stakeholders, even though I'd specifically mentioned being an account manager for major Australian organisations. Fair enough, I accepted it. But then, get this, five hours later they call back saying they're still undecided about me and want me to have a final interview with the co-founder. Against my better judgment, I agreed, and it was while I was actually on vacation. The third interview started with a really awkward 'oh..I see you're still employed....' The lack of respect was intense, especially coming from someone who's worked with C-suite execs before. They hadn't even prepped my CV. Just random boasts for no reason and constant interruptions when I was trying to explain Australian context for scale, which they just ignored. The questions weren't about my candidacy at all. I expected a cultural fit chat, but it felt like the co-founder was just killing time before rejecting me, which they eventually did. It felt like a formality to say no. I've never gone from super excited to totally disappointed so fast in any interview, but here we are. I will say this though, the Australian team knew exactly what they wanted, were professional, and interviewed really well. In a different context, I'd work for them in a heartbeat.

Confirmed questions7 questions
  • How do you prioritize a product backlog?
  • How do you categorize items like features and bugs?
  • What fundamentally drives you?
WorkJam logo
WorkJam

Director

Other

Director Average Positive experience Accept offer 5 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Onsite Phone screen Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Behavioral Behavioral Behavioral

I talked to HR, then my hiring manager (VP) over the phone remotely, then his colleague over the phone remotely, then the CEO in person, and then I got to talk to the hiring manager again over web video. Then I was given an offer. Most interview processes at WorkJam aren't like this, but it worked out for me. It let me get to know the people I'd be working with and our executive team better. I'm glad I took the offer.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • The interviews felt more like professional discussions rather than standard questions.

WorkJam Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from WorkJam interview reports.

What are the differences between LinkedHashMap and HashMap?

Read reports

Who would be your dream dinner guest, living or deceased?

Read report

How do you use annotations on outer methods or classes?

Read report

How would you implement the push() and pop() operations for a stack using an array?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 14 WorkJam interview reports.

Interview formats

Behavioral 45.2%
Technical 29%
Coding 19.4%
Case 3.2%
Presentation 3.2%

Interview difficulty

Easy 21.4%
Average 64.3%
Difficult 14.3%

Candidate experience

Positive 64.3%
Negative 28.6%
Neutral 7.1%

Reports by job function

Engineering 10
Product 2
Other 1
Operations 1