Shape Security Interview Questions
& Process

A recruiter reached out and I passed the initial technical coding take-home test, getting good feedback. The onsite involved five interviews back-to-back. The first technical interview went well. The VP and the final interviewer on the panel indicated that they generally only join if the candidate is well-received. They didn't make any guarantees but said they would follow up. I followed up about five times, but they either ignored me or the recruiter would say they were looking into it. The recruiter gave three different reasons for the delay, and I eventually asked them to stop bothering with updates. It had been over two weeks since the final interview, and they had promised feedback within two days. This was one of the worst interview experiences, as I never found out if I was rejected or if someone else was hired. They asked technical questions about CSS that weren't on the required skills list, despite needing Material UI. The recruiter also asked if I was married, which seemed inappropriate and possibly illegal.

It started with an introductory recruiter call, then moved to a 1st Round of 30 min onsite interviews, followed by a 2nd Round with 4 interviews, each around 30 minutes. Overall, it was a great process, very well organized and thorough. Although I wasn't the best fit and didn't get the offer, I really appreciate the effort and detailed approach taken by the Cyber Security team. Having met with several recruiters and senior leaders, I can confirm this company genuinely invests in its hiring process for all roles and aims to build a strong, lasting organization. If you get a chance to interview with them, you should.

The interview process involved two technical phone screens followed by an onsite interview with five people. The interviews heavily focused on understanding how to integrate their device into a network topology. I found some of the design questions unclear, and the interviewers seemed to jump between questions, making it difficult to follow. While I'm confident in designing networks with load balancers, I need clear requirements when incorporating additional devices. The format, with 2-3 interviewers questioning simultaneously, felt more like a technical support role interview, and surprisingly, it leaned more towards behavioral questions than technical ones.

The interview process was long, unprofessional, and a complete waste of time. Even though they knew I didn't have CDN experience, they only asked me questions about CDNs, ignoring my actual skills. They spent a lot of money flying me out only to tell me I lacked CDN knowledge, which I never claimed in the previous four interviews, including one with a VP. The feedback was obvious and unhelpful, showing them as narrow-minded and indecisive. The final round consisted of 5-6 separate interviews after I had already been interviewed four times. They asked a lot of questions about how I run programs because they were building one, so I hope they got their money's worth after I spent months in the process and days traveling.