Savvas Learning Company logo

Savvas Learning Company Software Engineer Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 12 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

2.4 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
41.7% Positive experience

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Savvas Learning Company.

Showing 3 of 12
Savvas Learning Company logo
Savvas Learning Company

Senior Software Engineer

Engineering · nearly a year ago

Senior Difficult Positive experience Accept offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Technical screen Technical screen Onsite Onsite
Interview formats
Coding System Design Technical

The interview process involved 2 rounds of technical interviews. After that, there was a round with the Director and VP. I had to show I could code by solving a problem, discuss system design, and demonstrate I understood cloud concepts, databases, and data warehouses.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you explain how Blue Green or canary deployments work?
Savvas Learning Company logo
Savvas Learning Company

Principal Software Engineer

Engineering · more than a year ago

Staff Average Positive experience Accept offer 5 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
System Design Technical

The recruiting HR was great with communication and organizing the interviews. It was 5 interview rounds with a mix of Principals and Directors, each lasting an hour. The process was a bit on the slower side, took almost 10 weeks for 5 rounds. There was almost a month wait before receiving the first call from recruiter.

Confirmed questions4 questions
  • Questions about designing a new system
  • Questions about integrating a new system
  • Questions focused on technical details
Savvas Learning Company logo
Savvas Learning Company

Software Developer

Engineering

Entry Easy Negative experience No offer 2 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Presentation Group Background check Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Coding Presentation Group

I had an interview back in January for a role starting in June. It was mostly behavioral with one technical question at the end, which I didn't do well on and was told I wouldn't be proceeding. Unexpectedly in March, I got an email for someone else's second-round interview. I pointed out the mistake and the recruiter apologized, saying they had more spots and changed their mind about me. Excited, I prepared for a second-round technical group interview. I met with two developers from different teams. Both I and another candidate had to present a coding project we'd done and then solve a database management project together. I did really well, even guiding the other candidate on database stuff. We both got positive feedback. By June, I'd heard nothing, not even a rejection. I contacted the recruiter but was ghosted. The whole process took over 6 months and felt like a waste of time. The recruiter's initial email mistake was unprofessional. I suspect they just wanted to interview the other guy again and used me as a decoy to see how he worked in a group.

Confirmed questions3 questions
  • Can you explain binary tree concepts?
  • Could you present a coding project you've completed?
  • How would you go about setting up and managing a database based on a given scenario?

Savvas Learning Company Software Engineer Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Savvas Learning Company interview reports.

Can you explain how Blue Green or canary deployments work?

Read report

Can you solve this problem involving database and API calls?

Read report

In a team setting, do you usually step up as a leader or prefer to be a follower?

Read report

When collaborating in a team, are you more inclined to lead or to follow?

Read report

How would you go about setting up and managing a database based on a given scenario?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 12 Savvas Learning Company interview reports.

Interview formats

Technical 31.4%
Behavioral 20%
Coding 17.1%
Presentation 11.4%
Group 11.4%

Interview difficulty

Easy 33.3%
Average 58.3%
Difficult 8.3%

Candidate experience

Positive 41.7%
Negative 33.3%
Neutral 25%