Omada Health Product Manager Interview Questions
& Process

The interview process for Omada Health’s Product Management Graduate Internship was clear, supportive, and well-organized. The recruiter was transparent and communicative throughout, which made the experience smooth. Interviews were friendly and focused on product thinking and collaboration. Overall, the process reflected Omada’s kind, mission-driven culture.

The interview experience was awesome, even though I didn't get an offer. Cyrina Avila, the recruiter, was the best I've worked with in 5 years. She stayed in touch and was really easy to reach. When things got delayed, she kept me updated. The coolest part was that Cyrina gave me detailed feedback after the onsite, telling me what I did well and what I could improve. No other company does this; they usually just say they can't share feedback. Everyone on the panel, including the hiring manager and stakeholders, was nice, seemed genuinely interested in me, and asked good questions. The process had 5 rounds: Round 1 was a 45min chat with the Hiring Manager. Round 2 involved four 30min chats with stakeholders from Eng, Design, Product, and Clinical. Round 3 was a 60min presentation about a project I worked on, followed by Q&A. Round 4 was a 15min follow-up call with the HM. Round 5 was for references.

I had an interview with a recruiter, then the hiring manager. After that, I was asked to complete a take-home assignment and then present it back to a group of about 7 people. They asked me to spend 3 hours prepping for the presentation and then present to the group. I was a bit hesitant because the take-home assignment was about solving a current need of the business, and they also added a note that all content and ideas presented would be owned by the company, so it felt a bit like free consulting. I felt like the interviews all went well and they were super engaged, asked questions, etc. but after my presentation, I received a generic automatic email saying they were moving forward with other candidates. After the amount of time I spent investing in this position, the least I deserved was a personal email from either the recruiter or the hiring manager. I am actually shocked that they boast about good culture, but treat applicants the way that they do. Based off other reviews, I am not the first to be treated this way. Lastly, the position was posted as an associate/entry level role, but the questions I was being asked were much more complex and similar to questions I was asked in senior product roles I’ve applied to. There is a very good chance that an entry-level person would not be able to answer some of the questions that were being asked, and I really think it should not be posted as entry-level as that would be very discouraging for someone trying to enter the workplace.