Natura Analyst Interview Questions
& Process

The selection process was quite smooth. I applied through the platform and had an initial screening with HR, where I received some information about the role. Afterward, I was directed to interview with the hiring managers. The entire process felt very relaxed and easygoing. Since the position involved a lot of English-based tasks, part of the interview required me to speak in English. Following this interview, there was supposed to be a final interview with the area director, but unfortunately, my academic background wasn't a match.

I applied for the Senior Analyst position, and the process involved an initial application, a chat with the recruitment team, submitting a case study, and then presenting that work to the area managers. The HR team was great at keeping me informed and was really helpful throughout, especially when they sent over and explained the case study. The task required a solution that fit the company's situation, showing strategic thinking and good reasoning. I spent a few days researching, structuring, and building the deliverable, and I got it done on time. For the presentation, I followed a clear plan, stuck to the 30-minute time limit, and used real examples from my career to answer questions. I also asked questions at the end to get a better feel for how the company works, showing I was genuinely interested. A few days later, I got a formal thank you note, but no detailed reasons why I wasn't selected, just that someone else 'seemed to fit' what they were looking for. When I asked for more feedback, they said they thought I might not handle a constantly changing environment with continuous deliverables well. This seemed odd because my presentation and the examples I shared actually highlighted my experience in exactly that kind of scenario. They also mentioned a technical aspect could have been explored more, even though it was covered objectively in the presentation and wasn't a stated requirement of the challenge. This made me feel like the evaluation was misaligned and the technical assessment was a bit weak. During the interview, some attitudes also came across as lacking empathy and active listening, which isn't a great experience for someone who put a lot of effort into preparing a proposal. Overall, the process was friendly, but the final feedback lacked clarity and depth, especially considering the high demands and effort required for the practical stage.

Had an initial chat with an HR agency, then a group interview with a dynamic activity, involving HR from the main company and the hiring manager. After that, there was an Excel test focusing on pivot tables and a presentation, followed by an interview with the direct manager.