Marsh Software Engineer Interview Questions
& Process

The process mainly involves looking at the resume and having a chat about behavioral questions. Typically, candidates are asked to give a good rundown of their background and experiences, making sure to point out their strengths and accomplishments. These are pretty typical questions, like asking the candidate for a short description of themselves.

It was pretty straightforward. The first round had three interviewers (technical, manager, and scrum master). Then there was a second round with higher management, followed by HR. I got quick feedback after the interview. The offer process was smooth, and the HR team was helpful and friendly.

I applied online and then a recruitment agency called me about my application. They called again a week later for a surprise short phone interview. After that, I was invited to an Assessment Centre which lasted about 4 hours. I had to prepare a 3-minute presentation on why Marsh should hire me. At the assessment centre, candidates introduced themselves and talked about their best achievement. We then did two group activities: one about surviving a shipwreck and another about solving a money puzzle. Marsh representatives and the recruitment agency watched us the whole time. After a break, we gave our presentations in individual rooms to three Marsh people. Finally, there was a short meeting with everyone where they told us how and when we'd be contacted if they wanted us for another interview. I was contacted about a week later. They said I was close but not quite what they were looking for, but they'd consider me if someone else dropped out. They said the agency would let me know either way. I agreed. I asked for feedback to improve my technique, but they said I'd have to wait. I didn't get called for another interview. When I asked for feedback again, the person said I needed to talk to someone else. I tried calling and emailing the staff member but got no reply for about two weeks. They apologized, saying they were busy with the candidates they hired. I understood but thought they had plenty of chances to give me feedback earlier. The feedback was mixed but helpful. They covered what I did well and not so well. Marsh liked me but thought I wasn't direct enough in group activities. They also said that even though I was right about some things in an activity, not pushing the group my way counted against me. Weirdly, one staff member commented that my hair was 'messy' and I should get a haircut, which I found tactless and inappropriate. The person I spoke to said it wasn't their opinion. The feedback took about 10 minutes. Overall, the bad parts made the good parts less significant. It taught me what to expect and what I don't want in employers. I'm not sure if this reflects on Marsh or the agency, but I'm glad I got the practice.