Major League Hacking logo

Major League Hacking Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 37 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

1.9 Rounds average
Easy Typical difficulty
81.1% Positive experience

Which role are you interviewing for?

5 roles · 37 reports

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Major League Hacking.

Showing 4 of 37
Major League Hacking logo
Major League Hacking

Site Reliability Engineer

Engineering · a year ago

Staff Easy Positive experience Accept offer 1 round
Interview process
Technical screen
Interview formats
Technical Presentation

The interview involved a deep dive into the submitted project, including specific questions about its functions. It was a short 15-minute session, and I was expected to demo the project and explain it as I went.

Confirmed questions3 questions
  • Could you elaborate on a particular function within your code?
  • Tell me about the project you submitted.
  • What specific functions in your code did you want to discuss further?
Major League Hacking logo
Major League Hacking

Fellow

Other · more than a year ago

Entry Difficult Negative experience No offer 1 round
Interview process
Recruiter call
Interview formats
Behavioral

The interviewer emailed stating I did not seem interested enough even when I wrote an entire essay stating my background, reasoning, and excitement towards this opportunity. I'm not sure how much more detailed I could get when you guys have a small word count maximum, They state that it's an educational program to help students, but they make it more competitive than any startup I applied to.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • What's your motivation for joining MLH?
Major League Hacking logo
Major League Hacking

Software Engineer

Engineering · more than a year ago

Intern Average Positive experience Accept offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Presentation
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Coding Presentation

For the Prep Internship, there were three interviews in total. The first one was about why you are interested in becoming a fellow. The second interview was to talk about your experience. In the third interview, you walk them through your code, and they might ask you a few questions about it. Each interview lasted about 15 minutes, and everyone was extremely nice.

Confirmed questions4 questions
  • What motivates your interest in becoming a fellow?
  • Could you share details about your technical background and career path?
  • Can you explain the functionality of your code?
Major League Hacking logo
Major League Hacking

MLH Fellow

Other

Entry Average Positive experience No offer 2 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

So there were 2 rounds in the interview process. The first was a behavioral round, lasting max 15 minutes, where they asked questions like why you want to be an MLH Fellow and your general passion for tech. The second round was technical and focused on the code sample you had previously submitted.

Confirmed questions3 questions
  • Why do you want to be a fellow?
  • Why are you passionate about technology?
  • Can you discuss the code sample you submitted?

Major League Hacking Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Major League Hacking interview reports.

What is the difference between a constant and a variable in js?

Read reports

Can you explain how the analytics were calculated for the URL shortener?

Read report

Can you explain the React-ref you utilized in your project?

Read report

What is the most recent tech stack/technology that you have learned, and what is the resource?

Read report

What was your reasoning for selecting the React framework?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 37 Major League Hacking interview reports.

Interview formats

Behavioral 40%
Technical 36%
Presentation 12%
Coding 10.7%
Other 1.3%

Interview difficulty

Easy 48.6%
Average 45.9%
Difficult 5.4%

Candidate experience

Positive 81.1%
Neutral 13.5%
Negative 5.4%

Reports by job function

Engineering 28
Other 8
Operations 1