Glidewell Dental logo

Glidewell Dental Software Engineer Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 8 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

3.2 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
75% Positive experience

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Glidewell Dental.

Showing 3 of 8
Glidewell Dental logo
Glidewell Dental

Software Engineer

Engineering

Mid Average Positive experience Accept offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Group Technical screen Take home
Interview formats
Group Technical Coding Coding

My interview with Glidewell was pretty unique compared to other places. The first day involved group interviews and a simple timed math test, which they apparently always do. There were three group interview rounds. In each round, a software developer would give us questions or tasks, and we'd have to collaborate as a team to solve them. The first round felt average in difficulty, the second was really easy, and the third was super tough. This was way different from other interviews because instead of one-on-one questions, they wanted to see how we'd work with others in a team. It was actually a fun experience for me since I prefer teamwork. After passing that, I got invited back for the 'technical interview.' They told me I'd pair program with a developer for an hour, doing some basic algorithms. Then, I had a 4-hour solo project to build an app that uses the Bing search engine. While it was solo, they said it was fine to ask for help from the other Glidewell folks in the room. I almost finished it; the main goal was to see how well I could research and ask for help.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • How would you create an application that integrates with the Bing search engine?
Glidewell Dental logo
Glidewell Dental

Senior Software Engineer

Engineering

Senior Average Negative experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Technical Coding Behavioral

I got a call from a recruiter on LinkedIn and had an initial phone screen over Skype. After that, there were a few hours of one-on-one interviews. The hiring manager did a good job explaining the interview process and what they'd be testing. They said the one-on-one with the team would be like peer programming, focusing on my thought process and allowing me to ask for help, not really testing my specific language skills. However, it was the total opposite once the interviews actually started. They gave me an app requirement and asked me to code in the Chrome console, but then decided it would be better to RDP into someone's machine. Also, every time I asked a question about what method would do something, probably because I was nervous with five people watching me and one lead developer occasionally sighing, it didn't help. To make things worse, the lead developer said he had to leave and needed his machine 20 minutes before the interview ended. I get that I was a nervous wreck coding in front of people when I knew I was being judged, but the hiring manager said beforehand that these were the kinds of issues they wanted to avoid, hence the peer programming where you aren't judged on language skills. But I was clearly judged on my Angular 5+ framework skills for a senior software engineer role. I really liked the hiring manager's process and leadership approach, but the lead developer clearly didn't implement it well. I've been a senior person in previous jobs and have helped my peers and junior developers, so I highly recommend people not join this team because it's not a very encouraging environment.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Tell me about an application you built using Angular.
Glidewell Dental logo
Glidewell Dental

Software Engineer

Engineering

Entry Average Positive experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Technical Coding Behavioral Other

I applied through my university's career site. First, there was a recruiter phone screen that wasn't too difficult. After that, I had an in-person interview. This included a chat with HR, a basic math test like in grade school, and then a technical interview with the hiring manager and a senior manager. They asked me about C++ concepts like method overloading versus overriding, and templates, plus some brain teaser type questions.

Confirmed questions3 questions
  • You have 1000 one dollar bills and 10 envelopes. How do you put the bills into the envelopes so that someone can ask you for any amount of money from $1 to $1000 and you can give it to them using a combination of the envelopes?
  • Suppose you are in a 100 story building and have two eggs. These eggs are especially strong. There is some floor below which the egg will not break if dropped. What is the worst case upper bound on the number of drops you must make to determine this floor?
  • What is a way to draw a line through a circle in a square to divide it in half?

Glidewell Dental Software Engineer Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Glidewell Dental interview reports.

What is a way to draw a line through a circle in a square to divide it in half?

Read reports

Suppose you are in a 100 story building and have two eggs. These eggs are especially strong. There is some floor below which the egg will not break if dropped. What is the worst case upper bound on the number of drops you must make to determine this floor?

Read reports

Can you create an algorithm for a robot to navigate a maze?

Read reports

You have 1000 one dollar bills and 10 envelopes. How do you put the bills into the envelopes so that someone can ask you for any amount of money from $1 to $1000 and you can give it to them using a combination of the envelopes?

Read report

How would you create an application that integrates with the Bing search engine?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 8 Glidewell Dental interview reports.

Interview formats

Coding 33.3%
Technical 29.2%
Behavioral 25%
Group 8.3%
Other 4.2%

Interview difficulty

Easy 0%
Average 75%
Difficult 25%

Candidate experience

Negative 12.5%
Positive 75%
Neutral 12.5%