Enfotech Interview Questions
& Process

I submitted my resume online and then got an email asking for my availability for interviews. The initial interview was an hour long, which felt pretty long. The hiring person then told me I passed and could schedule the second round, which was 4 hours long, which was amazing. They also asked for writing samples and references. This felt weird because usually, these materials are requested after the final interview. I sent them, but never heard back. Speechless company.

Human Resources called first to verify my qualifications and background. Then I had an in-person interview at the company, which was a one-on-one meeting with several people from different departments. The interviewers were really good at their jobs and it was a pleasant experience. After that, I interviewed with the CEO and CTO, and that went really well.

i interviewed with a project manager and then had a second interview with the director. the third interview involved taking tests, where there were a hundred questions to finish in an hour, which was very, very hard.

The interview process started with a 20-minute presentation on any topic I chose. Following that, I had individual one-on-one conversations with each of the three co-founders, which lasted about an hour in total. The entire interview process spanned roughly 4 hours. During these discussions, they spent more time talking about the company's strengths than asking about my background. I felt they were trying to gather personal information, like my relationship status, to gauge my potential tenure with the company. They also offered unsolicited advice on personal conduct. A few days later, I received a call informing me that I had the offer. I confirmed my acceptance three days after that. However, it took them about two weeks to send the official offer letter, and I had to follow up to receive it. This delay complicated my relocation plans. When I requested an additional three days to sign the offer due to my situation, they rescinded the offer immediately. While I understand it's their prerogative, their actions lacked consideration. Later, a former employee mentioned they had only been with the company for a year, contradicting the claim that most employees stay for over five years. The former employee also indicated that the work-life balance, which I was told was good after familiarization, is actually poor, similar to other feedback. It seems they often misrepresented the reality of working there.