Community Brands Software Development Solutions Interview Questions
& Process

So I had this interview for a .NET Developer role, they were looking for people with 1-4 years of experience. There were four rounds in total. The first round was a technical aptitude test with 20 questions related to asp.net, JQuery, and JavaScript, and I had 20 minutes to solve them. The second round was with the Project Manager, it was a general discussion about me, my career goals, and what I've worked on. The third round was a technical interview that lasted about 25-30 minutes. They asked me questions on basic OOPS concepts, .Net framework, JQuery, SQL, and JavaScript. The interviewer was helpful and explained things when I didn't know the answer. The fourth round was with HR, which was a typical chat about myself, my experience, and salary expectations.

So there were 5 rounds in total. First was an aptitude test, then a personal interview, followed by two technical interviews, and finally an HR round. Since I prefer manual and automation testing, they focused mainly on manual testing questions with fewer automation ones. They also asked questions related to Java and SQL queries. I passed all rounds except the last one. All interviewers were great, but the manager was a letdown. They rejected me solely because of a single spelling error on my resume, which was a terrible experience. The manager's attitude was that there's no room for correcting mistakes, which made me question the very existence of the testing field if such a rigid approach is taken.

First, there was a written test with 20 MCQs covering logic, quant, English, and programming. Then, a group discussion where we had to discuss 3 questions with the team. After that, a technical round that was a bit easy but went on for a while. The fourth round involved analytical questions, puzzles, and more technical stuff. The fifth round was an HR discussion, and the final round was a managerial discussion.

The whole day was taken up by the interview process. A technical test was given at 11 am and the results came back at 4 pm. Following that, there was a screening round, a technical face-to-face, and a managerial round. There seemed to be a lack of coordination regarding who submitted resumes and filled out forms, and the staff didn't seem aware of people's locations. Despite this, the staff were good, polite, and nice.