Verisk logo

Verisk Actuarial Analyst Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 19 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

2.7 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
52.6% Positive experience

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Verisk.

Showing 3 of 19
Verisk logo
Verisk

Actuary

Finance · nearly a year ago

Mid Average Negative experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Technical screen
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

The first couple of rounds were fine, standard stuff, good communication and scheduling. But then the third round got weird. The interviewer seemed to be looking for mistakes and trying to catch me out. I heard nothing back after that, not even a rejection.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • What's your reason for leaving your present employer?
Verisk logo
Verisk

Actuarial Analyst

Analytics · a year ago

Entry Average Positive experience Decline offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

First, there's a job screening. Then, you go through rounds to get to the typical interview process. As long as you understand and articulate well, it shouldn't be an issue. You'll get to know the culture at Verisk and see how your skills fit in. They have wonderful people and culture.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • What makes you want to join Verisk?
Verisk logo
Verisk

Actuarial Analyst

Analytics

Mid Average Negative experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite Background check Offer
Interview formats
Technical Behavioral

I got 2 onsite interviews for 2 similar positions. They both had a similar structure: an exam first, then a 3-hour interview with 3 rounds on the same day. I think if you pass, you get the job. The first round was with 2 high-level managers, the second with 2 lower-level managers, and the last round (if applicable) with 2 even lower-title people. About 50% of the people were nice, but they didn't seem to care much. The first team I met was okay, but they didn't show interest even before I started talking. The second team I interviewed with today was very 'diverse'. I met with 2 senior managers first, who were super nice and we had a good conversation about products and the company; it felt like a normal get-to-know-you chat. The second team I met was okay, 3 people, one was sleepy and yawning but seemed nice. The final group, with 2 low-title people, was a nightmare. They came in, crossed their legs like bosses, and asked a ton of detailed questions about a non-related position I had 3 years ago, kept asking 'why why why'. I explained a few times, then they gave up and moved on, repeating the same thing. Interestingly, they had no experience with the software I used and didn't pay attention when I explained it, though they thought they were smart. It was torture, not an interview, they were asking questions in the wrong field. I knew I lost my chance after meeting them. It really shows how personality matters for different levels.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Were there any HR questions when you met with managers?

Verisk Actuarial Analyst Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Verisk interview reports.

What are the key risk factors to consider when underwriting commercial auto insurance?

Read reports

Could you explain the distinctions between Actuarial Science as applied to Life, Health, and P&C insurance?

Read reports

Could you write a brief essay on the topic of insurance?

Read report

What strategies do you use to overcome difficult exams?

Read report

Can you tell me about your knowledge of Actuarial Science?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 19 Verisk interview reports.

Interview formats

Technical 40%
Behavioral 37.8%
Coding 11.1%
Other 8.9%
Presentation 2.2%

Interview difficulty

Easy 5.3%
Average 78.9%
Difficult 15.8%

Candidate experience

Positive 52.6%
Neutral 15.8%
Negative 31.6%