Two Chairs Interview Questions
& Process

After being given a project prompt, I prepared a comprehensive presentation detailing each step outlined in the prompt and considering alternative solutions. I also explored potential outcomes of different approaches for a well-rounded analysis. The COO asked detailed questions about my reasoning and methodology, which I explained. He then asked to review the workbook used for the presentation. After sharing it, I received an auto-generated rejection email with no explanation. My follow-up messages to the recruiter were ignored. This abrupt rejection and lack of transparency after sharing my work felt like my effort was used without genuine consideration. I strongly advise anyone applying here to be very conscious about working here and sharing your work.

The interview process was quite long, and it was evident they were selective about candidates. I went through at least 4 interview rounds. The final stage involved a case study that I had to present to a group of interviewers. I appreciated having the recruiter involved throughout, but ultimately, I didn't get the job. I do believe they made the right call given the role's needs, and I think the team is strong.

The interview process started with a recruiter call/screening, followed by another interview with the recruiter, and then a second interview with the clinical team. After the second interview, I wasn't contacted back. The recruiter was very helpful and explained every question they'd ask so I wouldn't be surprised. I was put off by the unprofessionalism of not getting a clear reason for not being offered the job, especially since both the recruiter and interviewer seemed impressed with my qualifications and experience and even asked about my potential start date and other logistical details. I suspect I might have been "forgotten about." The same recruiter has contacted me on different platforms since then, trying to get me to apply for other positions (including the one I already applied for), acting like we've never interacted before. They can't even keep track of who they've contacted.

The whole interview process had about 7 or 8 stages, mostly 1-on-1 meetings, and included a take-home case study. This took about 8 weeks total, so only apply if you're really set on working here. The interviewers were pleasant, but the questions were very similar, boring, and repetitive. It felt like there were way too many steps, and the executive I spoke with seemed arrogant and didn't add any real value. It also took nearly two weeks after the last interview to get a final decision. It's obvious the team has a specific type of person in mind and prioritizes perfection over potential. I wouldn't suggest this interview process unless they make big improvements and cut down on the many, long rounds.