Seeing Machines Limited logo

Seeing Machines Limited Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 15 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

2.7 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
86.7% Positive experience

Which role are you interviewing for?

10 roles · 15 reports

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Seeing Machines Limited.

Showing 4 of 15
Seeing Machines Limited logo
Seeing Machines Limited

Algorithm Performance Engineer

Engineering · more than a year ago

Mid Average Positive experience Decline offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Coding Behavioral

I had a phone chat with the recruitment manager first. Then, I had an online interview with the head of the algorithm performance team and the head of engineering. Lastly, I did an in-person interview with those same two people, which included a live coding session and some basic questions about what I'm interested in.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • A live coding session focusing on data manipulation with Pandas
Seeing Machines Limited logo
Seeing Machines Limited

Data Engineering Manager

Engineering · more than a year ago

Manager Average Negative experience Decline offer 2 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral

This cool tech company with a solid mission advertised a remote-friendly job, but then upon offering the role, it became clear that a lot of in-person time in Canberra was required. I do sense a few gaps within the company.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Are you open to being in the Canberra office 3-5 days per week?
Seeing Machines Limited logo
Seeing Machines Limited

Graduate Program

Other · more than a year ago

Entry Average Positive experience No offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Group Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Group Behavioral Technical

The interview process was professional and followed a clear order. However, there were many candidates, leading to longer waiting times than anticipated. The group discussion had a restricted time limit and felt a bit unexpected, making the overall experience feel rushed. The interviewer maintained a neutral expression and provided no feedback on my answers to the behavioral questions.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you give us a product recommendation for the future?
Seeing Machines Limited logo
Seeing Machines Limited

Software Engineer

Engineering

Mid Easy Positive experience No offer 5 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite Take home Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Coding Presentation

First, a quick chat with HR or a recruiter to see if you meet the basics. Then, a deeper dive with someone from the tech team to check your skills. After that, it's a full day at the office meeting lots of people, both tech and not, to see if you're a good fit and for you to learn about us. Sometimes, they might throw in a case study or a project to see how you solve problems. If all goes well, they'll make an offer, and you can decide if you want to take it or try to negotiate.

Confirmed questions8 questions
  • Tell me about a technical project you've worked on.
  • Describe your experience with [specific technology or programming language].
  • How would you solve this technical problem?

Seeing Machines Limited Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Seeing Machines Limited interview reports.

Are you open to being in the Canberra office 3-5 days per week?

Read reports

Were there more technical and specific questions than you anticipated?

Read report

Walk me through how you would debug a [specific type of issue].

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 15 Seeing Machines Limited interview reports.

Interview formats

Behavioral 37.5%
Technical 34.4%
Coding 15.6%
Presentation 6.2%
Group 3.1%

Interview difficulty

Easy 26.7%
Average 53.3%
Difficult 20%

Candidate experience

Positive 86.7%
Negative 6.7%
Neutral 6.7%

Reports by job function

Engineering 12
Operations 1
Other 1
Analytics 1