Rover.com logo

Rover.com Data Scientist Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 10 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

3.7 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
70% Positive experience

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Rover.com.

Showing 3 of 10
Rover.com logo
Rover.com

Data Scientist

Analytics · a year ago

Senior Average Positive experience Accept offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Take home Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Behavioral Case Technical Coding

The interview process was super organized, though it did take a while. Everyone I met was fantastic and made the interviews feel like a team effort, really comfortable. Recruiting was on top of communication. I got to meet the whole team, which honestly made me more excited to join. It started with a chat about behavior and an ML case study with the Hiring Manager. Then, I had a take-home task. After passing that, there was a technical check and a discussion about the take-home. The final part was a remote onsite loop with three interviews: another ML case study, stats, and a behavioral one.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • A take-home analytics assignment using toy data and Python, primarily serving as a test of thought process.
Rover.com logo
Rover.com

Data Scientist

Analytics · more than a year ago

Mid Easy Positive experience Accept offer 6 rounds
Interview process
Take home Recruiter call Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Technical Behavioral

So I started with a take-home analytics thing, which was easy. Then I had a call with the hiring manager that wasn't technical. After that, there was a technical screen with stats and coding. The final part was a remote 'on-site' with 4 interviews, each with 2 people, focusing on my past technical work and if I fit with Rover's values. The whole thing was super organized, like the take-home instructions were clear and they gave me lots of info. They responded fast to emails and scheduling. I also felt treated like a human, not just a tool, which was different from other places.

Confirmed questions2 questions
  • A take-home assignment and then a non-technical screening call followed by a technical screening round.
  • The final part was 4 rounds of an 'on-site' (remote) interview loop, focusing on technical aspects of my previous work and my alignment with the core values at Rover.
Rover.com logo
Rover.com

Data Scientist

Analytics · more than a year ago

Mid Easy Negative experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Take home Technical screen Onsite
Interview formats
Technical Coding

I did a long take-home assessment, then two technical phone screens, and finally an on-site interview. At the end, they said they needed someone with more experience than my project work showed. It's frustrating because their data science take-home is pretty involved, and I wonder if they even looked at my resume or if the technical screens were pointless if that's their main criterion. I'd rather have no feedback than hear that. Also, I learned an associate data scientist there makes $75k, which is really low for this area. I like dogs, but I won't be reapplying.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you tell me about simulating coin flips?

Rover.com Data Scientist Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Rover.com interview reports.

What is the R or Python function for performing that test?

Read reports

Which time series model would be appropriate for this scenario?

Read reports

What statistical test would you employ to compare booking rates?

Read reports

Given a schema, how would you construct a model to address a specific question?

Read report

Can you share an instance where you took a risk with incomplete information?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 10 Rover.com interview reports.

Interview formats

Technical 32.3%
Behavioral 22.6%
Coding 22.6%
Case 9.7%
Presentation 9.7%

Interview difficulty

Easy 20%
Average 50%
Difficult 30%

Candidate experience

Positive 70%
Negative 20%
Neutral 10%