Process Street Interview Questions
& Process

The interview process had about 3 or 4 stages in total, including a technical assessment. It started with a general fit interview, followed by an interview with another solutions interviewer. Then, there was an interview with the role's superior, and I think one more with another executive. The team members were great and the interviews were as pleasant as interviews can be. The technical task involved creating a workflow with Process Street and some external services, specifically a new client workflow using Google Workspace, Zapier, and Process Street. It seems like a nice company, and they even provided helpful feedback.

Applied online and a few days later got a form about my experience with Angular and React, which I filled out with my extensive knowledge. A week after, I got an email to schedule a video call. The call was fine, with some basic technical questions which I answered correctly due to my experience. The interviewer explained the process and next steps and said they would send more information. The next day, I received a generic rejection email, not a good fit, despite having all the required skills and more. It felt like a formality, maybe to meet investor quotas, as I don't think they are actually hiring anyone right now. I'd avoid this company.

I applied for a Junior Customer Support role and was rejected, but I still went through the whole selection process. I was drawn in by their marketing, hoping the company was as great as they advertised, but the reality is quite different, and I'd tell others to avoid finding out the hard way. Don't apply unless you absolutely have no other choice. Here's some quick advice: Applying for a junior role shouldn't be this long and demanding, with meetings going up to the CEO. Their talk about long hours and commitment might signal management issues or a toxic culture where working late is a badge of honor. When they ask about your flexibility, it might foreshadow future demands. They'll seem open about daily support problems, but get defensive and agitated if asked how these issues have changed over the past year, revealing struggles with feature releases and internal team conflicts. They're unclear about providing home office equipment, yet insist on specific computer setups without mentioning financial support. They might also miss deadlines for notifying you about the next steps without apology. The selection process starts with a time-consuming video demonstration of the platform, which is estimated to take less time than it actually does, potentially leading hundreds of candidates to waste hours. This could be a tactic to get free use of their software. Don't invest too much time early on; make sure they're serious about considering you before dedicating your time.

To start, I was asked to complete a writing assignment of over 2,000 words, with the promise that it would be published on their website if I moved forward. I sent it in but got no response, even after a few emails asking for feedback. About 3-4 weeks later, I finally got an interview offer, still without any feedback on my writing. It felt like my work wasn't even reviewed. The interview itself was supposed to be 30 minutes, but the interviewer spent 20 minutes talking about their role and then asked me to "talk about myself." After that, they asked if I had questions. When I inquired about the interview process, I was told there would be four more interviews, including one with the CEO, which seemed excessive for a junior role. The interview ended there, and I was told I'd hear back by Monday, but I didn't get a response until Tuesday, letting me know they'd gone with someone else who was a "closer match to some of the specifics." They didn't provide any details about these specifics when I asked. I later emailed again about my blog post potentially being published, and the interviewer seemed unaware of it, stating they don't usually publish candidate work. I sent them the original instructions, and they said they'd "pass it along," but it still hasn't been published. While the interviewer was pleasant, the company doesn't seem to respect candidates' time, especially by not providing feedback on submitted work when rejecting someone.