Marshall Wace logo

Marshall Wace Graduate Program Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 7 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

3 Rounds average
Difficult Typical difficulty
57.1% Positive experience

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Marshall Wace.

Showing 3 of 7
Marshall Wace logo
Marshall Wace

Graduate Scheme

Other · a year ago

Entry Difficult Positive experience No offer 1 round
Interview process
Group
Interview formats
Group Behavioral

The interview process was good. All the interviewers were friendly. The interview process was pretty difficult though. The office looks professional. Overall, the process is positive to me. Although I was not offered the position, I am glad that it brings me positive experience.

Confirmed questions2 questions
  • What motivated you?
  • Group test
Marshall Wace logo
Marshall Wace

Technology Graduate Scheme

Engineering

Entry Difficult Positive experience No offer 6 rounds
Interview process
Technical screen Recruiter call Take home Technical screen Group Presentation Background check Offer
Interview formats
Coding Technical Behavioral Group Presentation

The interview process started with a HackerRank assessment featuring fairly straightforward questions. This was followed by a 15-minute HR interview using a standard set of questions. The main part of the process was an on-site assessment. They're known to send candidates home early if they feel the performance is poor and there's no longer a chance for an offer. The day began with being given a computer and a document with 15 questions to answer within an hour. Internet and Google use were permitted. The questions covered a broad and open range, including SQL queries for data extraction, debugging a JavaScript web-parser, and writing a 'HELLO WORLD' program in a custom language using ASCII encoding, all designed to gauge general technical knowledge and problem-solving skills. Afterward, a team member discussed the answers. Then, a group exercise took place where candidates were given a scenario (like being stranded in a jungle and choosing survival items) and had to discuss their choices with others, observed by HR for about 20 minutes. Lunch followed, providing an opportunity to chat with current graduate programmers. Post-lunch included an interview with two team members, involving a 30-minute project presentation and a 30-minute CV review. Subsequently, there was an interview with a manager, and finally, a discussion with the CTO. Overall, the experience was positive, with sharp and friendly interviewers. Travel expenses for a prior night's stay were reimbursed, as the day started at 9 am in London.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Which technological advancement are you currently most enthusiastic about?
Marshall Wace logo
Marshall Wace

Technology Graduate Scheme

Other

Entry Average Negative experience No offer 5 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Technical screen Onsite Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

The interview process was not great. I didn't hear back from them, even after I emailed to ask about my application's status. I've made it to the final round before and was expecting the same, but they really need to improve how they communicate with potential employees because it makes me hesitant to want to work there.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • What motivates your interest in working at Marshall Wace?

Marshall Wace Graduate Program Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Marshall Wace interview reports.

Which technological advancement are you currently most enthusiastic about?

Read reports

What motivates your interest in working at Marshall Wace?

Read report

Are you able to collaborate effectively within a team?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 7 Marshall Wace interview reports.

Interview formats

Behavioral 43.8%
Coding 25%
Group 12.5%
Technical 12.5%
Presentation 6.2%

Interview difficulty

Easy 28.6%
Average 28.6%
Difficult 42.9%

Candidate experience

Neutral 14.3%
Positive 57.1%
Negative 28.6%