KQED Interview Questions
& Process

I had an initial interview that focused on culture fit, specifically asking how I would foster diversity. After that, there was just radio static and no automated rejection email. The ATS mentioned the position was on hold, which would have been helpful to know sooner. I had higher expectations for a local public media outlet.

I was contacted by an HR assistant via email about being selected for an HR phone screen. The process moved quickly. The HR rep interrupted my answers to say I didn't need to impress her and that most people get past her. The 30-minute interview felt insincere. She told me I'd advance. Right after, the HR assistant informed me I was moving on to the hiring manager and scheduled the next interview efficiently. The hiring manager seemed rushed but was friendly and positive. They said they'd respond by the end of the week (it was a Monday). Three weeks later, I haven't heard back. I emailed HR twice with no response. I feel fortunate to have avoided this situation. I hope they find someone suitable for the role and treat them better than I was treated.

Had a call with the recruiter, then the hiring manager, and then a panel interview with the design team. The recruiter didn't seem to grasp how the role worked with union representation and gave me incorrect information about union dues, so I had to contact the local syndicate rep for clarification. The panel interview got rescheduled mid-week, and then on the morning of the interview, they emailed with details on what they'd discuss and the type of work I should highlight, forcing me to change my prep focus that same day. Also, one panel member kept cutting me off during my presentation. I never heard back and was ghosted by their team and HR.

The interview process included an initial HR phone screen, a 30-minute phone interview, a 1-hour Zoom screen with a panel, and a 30-minute Zoom screen with the supervisor. All interviewers were well-prepared, friendly, and professional. The interviews started on time and ran as scheduled, with interviewers keeping the candidate on track despite potential verbosity. They were invested in answering candidate questions. The team was smart and professional, providing clear and expedited next steps and timelines, making the process relatively painless.