Infovision, Inc. Interview Questions
& Process

This was one of the most unprofessional interview experiences I had in my 8 years as a designer. There was no structure, no prep, and no respect for my experience. The interviewer was a developer but didn't ask any real design questions. The conversation was all over the place and felt really awkward. The craziest part? He gave me the wrong company email by mistake, told me to send the task there, and then just hung up without confirming anything. This is so careless, especially for senior folks. Giving a task is fine, but wrong details and ending the call like that is totally unprofessional and uncoordinated. The whole thing felt rushed, disrespectful, and badly managed. My advice to management: please train your interviewers better to be prepared and respectful of candidates' time and experience. This interview really makes the company look bad.

The interview process started with 2 technical rounds, then a manager round, and finally HR. The HR wasn't great at communicating. Initially, they said salary would be market rate for 15 years experience. After the technical rounds, the manager acted like it was an appraisal and asked for a promise to join before salary was even discussed with HR. The HR requested a face-to-face interview, but it ended up being a Teams video call. The offer was 25 LPA for 15 years experience, which seemed low as they were targeting 7-10 years experience. The HR mentioned another 'Techno manager connect' and then made the candidate wait an hour only to say they had to leave because no one was available for another round. An offer was not accepted, but the HR sent a 'congratulations' email anyway. Despite the rejection, HR kept calling and scheduled another interview with the same manager. After that, the manager wanted yet another face-to-face interview. In total, there were 6 rounds, with 3 interviews with the same manager. Even though the candidate didn't want to do the 6th round due to salary not being finalized, HR insisted. The manager did another technical interview, introduced the candidate to the team, showed them the labs, and then stated they couldn't offer the job because the answers were 'vague' and they didn't have the budget. It's baffling why they'd conduct 6 rounds for someone with vague answers and no budget. It makes you wonder.

So I interviewed for a QA Automation Engineer role at Infovision. I went through four technical rounds and was feeling pretty good about it, with just the client round left. But after the fourth round, the interviewer for the client round didn't show up. After that, HR from Infovision went totally silent, which was super unprofessional. I tried following up, but they finally told me the client put the position on hold. This whole time, I'd turned down like 2 or 3 other interviews because I thought Infovision was a sure thing and didn't want to lead anyone else on.

The interview process involved understanding the roles and responsibilities of an SM and Scrum roles, events, previous project details, user stories, DOR DOD values, Scrum principles, and Agile principles. There were also scenario-based questions about sprint planning and retrospectives. They asked about DSU details, introductions, and project details, including the project name. They also asked different questions based on scenarios about how I would tackle a given problem statement.