Human Rights Watch logo

Human Rights Watch Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 109 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

2.1 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
64.8% Positive experience

Which role are you interviewing for?

19 roles · 109 reports

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Human Rights Watch.

Showing 4 of 109
Human Rights Watch logo
Human Rights Watch

Director

Operations · a year ago

Director Average Negative experience No offer 1 round
Interview process
Recruiter call Onsite
Interview formats
Behavioral

Applied in Feb 2025, heard nothing for a couple of months. Then, surprisingly, got invited to a first-stage interview with the hiring manager after almost three months. It was a 45-minute relaxed "coffee chat" where we got to know each other. I thought it went well and felt positive about the role and organisation. Was told I'd be contacted either way and a final stage was likely for end of May. Since then, over a month ago, no feedback, no updates, no response to follow-ups. The silence is frustrating. While I understand hiring can be busy, a quick message to close the loop is minimal effort and not receiving one feels disorganized and disrespectful, especially for an organisation that promotes fairness.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you tell me about your experience working internationally?
Human Rights Watch logo
Human Rights Watch

Associate

Other · more than a year ago

Entry Average Negative experience No offer 2 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Panel Background check
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

The interviewers were nice, but the lack of communication was really frustrating. I had a basic phone interview to learn about the position, and then the next week I had the final panel interview. They really hyped me up, saying I stood out, was well-spoken and passionate, and a great fit. The job was supposed to start in two weeks, but after a month of no contact, I got a rejection. They said they'd keep me in mind for future roles, but my emails for follow-ups went unanswered. This happened again a few months later for a similar role, where I wasn't updated for a month.

Confirmed questions3 questions
  • Could you list the software you have experience with?
  • What are your career aspirations for the next five years?
  • How can your past skills be relevant to this role?
Human Rights Watch logo
Human Rights Watch

Fossil Fuels Researcher

Research · more than a year ago

Mid Average Negative experience No offer 5 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Take home Presentation Panel Background check Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Presentation Other

So the process was really long and I felt like they didn't consider how much time it took. It started with an automated online video interview. I got a link to answer 5 or 6 questions about my motivations and past experiences. It took about 30 minutes, and I had 3 to 5 minutes to prep and 3 to 5 minutes to answer, depending on the question. I had two weeks to do it, which was flexible. It might be a bit of a shock if you've never done a video interview before because everything's timed and the software just moves on. The questions themselves were pretty easy and general, just needed to be quick to answer. Then, a week later, they sent a written assignment with three parts. Part one was a memo proposing a specific new research project (700 words). Part two was an internal memo proposing a three-year research and advocacy strategic plan (1600 words). Part three was a dispatch (400 words). I know people in other departments who never had assignments this tough. Even with a week, it was massive! I spent a lot of unpaid hours working on research and advocacy ideas and a strategy for the role. I figured out the division is new and they're building their strategy and team with fresh ideas. As a researcher, I actually found it motivating, giving me a glimpse of what the job could be. The third step was a panel interview with two directors, two seniors, and an associate, lasting an hour. I found the hiring manager and panelists pretty disengaged and not very curious. They weren't interested in my past research, fieldwork, or me. It was supposed to be a conversation, but they just took turns asking questions. Very few follow-ups or technical questions. Most were repeats from the video interview. I realized pretty quickly I wasn't their first choice. Plus, we didn't even discuss the written assignment, and I got no feedback on the hours I put in or the ideas I shared. No follow-up on the strategy or research projects I proposed. HR was terrible with communication, never replying to my emails. Communication was bad from the start. I noticed a typo on the video interview deadline and had to figure it out myself by contacting the provider. I never got updates on my application, even though the hiring manager said they usually get back within two weeks and always provide an answer at this stage. I sent four emails (two to HR, two to the hiring manager), and no one even replied to my thank you note after the panel. After weeks of silence following the panel, I was confused when I saw HRW released a statement on a topic related to my dispatch, even using the same image I used. I mean, how weird is that? After my fourth email, the hiring manager told me they were negotiating with another candidate and were hopeful, but due to administrative issues, they hadn't made a formal offer. They couldn't officially say I wasn't chosen but were hopeful. He said he was telling me this because I mentioned having other opportunities. No kind words, not even an apology for the silence. I can't believe a manager would give such an unprofessional answer to someone who invested so much time. HR could have just said they were still reviewing or that they chose someone else. Then, a month later, I got a polite note saying they'd offered the role to someone else and thanked me for my patience, with the usual 'better fit' reason. I knew it could take time, but it feels unfair to take someone so far and give so little feedback, updates, or consideration. This lack of communication during the agreed timeframe, despite a very demanding assessment process, really doesn't reflect well on the organization. Nothing justifies this lack of professionalism from HR or the managers. I hope this review helps candidates prepare and, more importantly, helps HR and management rethink their processes.

Confirmed questions8 questions
  • What motivated you to apply for this specific position?
  • What do you consider to be the most significant human rights abuses linked to the exploration, extraction, production, transportation, marketing, and combustion of fossil fuels?
  • What experience do you have interviewing individuals who have been affected by oil, gas, and/or coal projects?
Human Rights Watch logo
Human Rights Watch

Associate

Other · more than a year ago

Entry Easy Positive experience Accept offer 6 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Panel Take home Background check Offer
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Presentation

I sent in my application via their online system. The whole thing took about 3 months, with the actual hiring part taking 8 weeks. I heard back 6 weeks after the deadline for the job. It was an invite to an automated interview, which was pretty chill and easy. It actually helped me relax since I could take my time to think before answering. I had 7 questions in total, mostly about my past experiences, why I want this job, and why I like the organization. Two weeks later, I got an email saying I made it to the next stage. This was an online panel interview with 4 people from Human Rights Watch. It was fun, but also pretty intense. They asked a mix of scenario-based questions and general ones about my background, the job, and the company. A few hours after that, they told me I had a written assessment. I got the details on Monday. It tested my skills in writing professional documents like an email, a short note, and an invitation to a diplomat. I had 3 hours to do it. About 10 days later, the Regional Director called to confirm my references. They checked them out, and I got an offer a week after that.

Confirmed questions5 questions
  • How will your past experiences help you in this role?
  • Why are you interested in this specific job and the organization as a whole?
  • Could you elaborate on your previous experiences?

Human Rights Watch Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Human Rights Watch interview reports.

What do you consider to be the most significant human rights abuses linked to the exploration, extraction, production, transportation, marketing, and combustion of fossil fuels?

Read reports

What do you see as the most important current issue in LGBT rights?

Read reports

Can you elaborate on instances of HR violations in East Africa and their progression?

Read reports

Where would you start and what steps would you take if you were tasked with researching sexual assault on college campuses?

Read reports

Could you list the specific news outlets or platforms you regularly consult?

Read report

What are your thoughts on the human rights situation in a specific country?

Read report

How can we improve or position HRW in mainstream media and social media?

Read report

When reaching out to a potential donor, what do you think is the most crucial step?

Read report

Can you speak in a foreign language relevant to your regional interests?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 109 Human Rights Watch interview reports.

Interview formats

Behavioral 49.3%
Technical 26.3%
Other 11.2%
Presentation 10.7%
Coding 2%

Interview difficulty

Easy 12.8%
Average 72.5%
Difficult 14.7%

Candidate experience

Negative 17.6%
Positive 64.8%
Neutral 17.6%

Reports by job function

Other 57
Research 17
Operations 13
Engineering 8
HR 8
Marketing 4