CyberForce|Q Interview Questions
& Process

It was a 4 part interview over the course of a month, involving three phone calls and one in person. Overall the interviewers were professional. The first was a phone call with HR, asking generic questions about my goals, how I found the role, and why I was interested. The second was a phone call with the SOC lead where they asked technical questions, covering both entry and mid-level security topics. These questions seemed to come from common online IT interview banks, so it was possible to prepare for them. The third interview was in-person with the SOC lead and the Chief Operations Officer. This one was more about general questions, who I am, and what I aim to do. They did a lot of 'resume probing' to verify what I had written. The final interview was a phone call with the Founder/President/Owner. It wasn't HR or technical, but more of an unorthodox conversation to understand my background and thinking. I got the impression they were assessing how I would benefit them. I declined the offer because the amount of responsibility, accountability, and the metrics required didn't match the compensation.

The interview process is multi-step. After the first two interviews went well, I was invited for a third interview, referred to as a 'working interview.' I was told I'd observe some tasks but instead, I ended up working for free and providing information from my degree. I conducted an interview for a candidate and prepared paperwork for a role. They exploited my skills and labor. Legally, 'working interviews' require payment, which I didn't receive. If they get frustrated or don't like the answers, they speak condescendingly. They expect entry-level candidates to commit to this job permanently, even though most entry-level roles are temporary.

The interview was pretty straight forward and I was asked generic questions about my background and why I would want to work for this small company doing what I do. As I was elaborating on details the interviewer cut me short and mocked me because I wasn't answering the questions the way they wanted me to which was very offensive. If this company wants young bright individuals working for them, they have to take the time to LISTEN to what they have to say. I'm glad I didn't waste further time with a company that I can already see many people complaining they are treated like pawns by those on top of the pyramid.

Applied online and then got an email to set up an on-site interview. Had a regular in-person interview with a director. They asked some really hard questions for an intern job. The interviewer started by saying, 'Don't get discouraged, I ask these questions to everyone I interview, even full-time people, just do your best.' The interviewer expected a student applying for an internship to know as much as someone already working full-time.