Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace logo

Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace Interview Questions
& Process

Real candidates share what happened, how many rounds they had,
and how the experience turned out.

Based on 31 interview experiences · FREE TO READ

2.1 Rounds average
Average Typical difficulty
54.8% Positive experience

Which role are you interviewing for?

8 roles · 31 reports

Candidate interview experiences

First-hand accounts from people who interviewed at Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace.

Showing 4 of 31
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace logo
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace

Program Assistant

Operations · more than a year ago

Entry Average Positive experience No offer 2 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Panel
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

After applying, I went through two interviews and was one of two finalists. The whole process was pretty fast, lasting only about three weeks. The interviews were with the director and some fellows. I'd recommend researching the fellows you might meet to get a better idea of how you can assist them. They were quite casual and enjoyable discussions about the field and how you'd fit into the team.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • Can you describe your experience with grant writing and in preparing grant reports?
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace logo
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace

Editor

Other · more than a year ago

Mid Average Negative experience No offer 3 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Technical screen Take home
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical

Interviewing with Carnegie Endowment for International Peace was a really weird experience, and I’d tell people to be careful. It started off well, with HR being clear and flexible about scheduling, which was nice. The four interviewers were also polite and organized, and the interviews themselves seemed to go fine. However, it felt like it was all just for show because they ended up hiring an internal candidate without telling us. They didn't give any hints this might happen, like a super short job posting period. I don’t get why they’d interview so many people if they already had a favorite internal candidate. And why put us through a long process with two interviews and an editing test if we weren't really being considered? At best, Carnegie seems to care about appearances – making the hiring process look fair – when they really disrespected the candidates and staff who put a lot of time and effort into it. At worst, Carnegie seems to have a fake and insular work culture.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • What's your approach when an author disagrees with all your suggested edits?
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace logo
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace

Research Assistant

Operations

Entry Difficult Negative experience No offer 4 rounds
Interview process
Recruiter call Phone screen Take home Technical screen Presentation
Interview formats
Behavioral Technical Presentation Other

It started with a 30-minute Zoom call with the hiring team for the research assistant role, but it quickly became clear they were actually looking for an event planner or administrative assistant, which wasn't what the job description suggested. The vibe was super awkward, and the interviewers seemed out of sync. Then, HR called out of the blue to talk salary, making it known that research assistants max out at $40k-$46k, regardless of education or experience. Next up was a writing assessment, which was basically an event planning project with a 24-hour deadline and minimal, unclear instructions. The final interview focused on the writing task, and the atmosphere felt really tense and confrontational. A heads-up: HR contacts candidates by phone, not email, so be ready for unexpected salary talks and interview scheduling. The whole thing dragged on for weeks, and candidates who didn't get the offer were ghosted by HR.

Confirmed questions6 questions
  • Can you describe the event planning process you used?
  • What potential risks did you identify in your event plan?
  • How did you plan to maintain communication throughout the event?
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace logo
Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace

Communications Assistant

Marketing

Entry Average Negative experience No offer 1 round
Interview process
Recruiter call Background check
Interview formats
Behavioral

I got contacted a few weeks after applying. They were interested in my personal and professional background. The interview was with two staff members and lasted about 20 minutes. They seemed interested in my experience, but when I explained more, it became clear they thought I was overqualified or misunderstood the job description. Since it's an entry-level role, you'd think there'd be room to grow, but they said there wasn't. It was obvious they just needed someone to fill the spot. The job description sounded better than how they described it. I never heard back, even after sending a thank you email.

Confirmed questions1 question
  • How does your background connect with this role?

Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace Interview Questions

Quoted word for word from Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace interview reports.

What recent economic trends do you think are important to pay attention to?

Read reports

Considering your international experience, how will you ensure the same range and depth of research while in Washington, since you won't have direct "on the ground" access like a Junior Fellow?

Read reports

Could you discuss a recent news story concerning China and share your perspective on it?

Read reports

Describe the steps you would take to create a newsletter.

Read report

What's your approach when an author disagrees with all your suggested edits?

Read report

What potential risks did you identify in your event plan?

Read report

What research areas would you be interested in supporting?

Read report

Why are you interested in interning at Carnegie India?

Read report

Formats, difficulty and experience

Across all 31 Carnegie Endowment for Intl. Peace interview reports.

Interview formats

Behavioral 49.1%
Technical 29.8%
Presentation 12.3%
Other 8.8%

Interview difficulty

Easy 12.9%
Average 74.2%
Difficult 12.9%

Candidate experience

Positive 54.8%
Neutral 19.4%
Negative 25.8%

Reports by job function

Research 13
Other 8
Operations 6
Engineering 2
Design 1
Marketing 1